We recently dined at a local restaurant as a family of four. Husband, myself, our 10 year old and our 3 month old.
Upon ordering we were informed that we would be charged $30 cover charge for our 3 month old.
When we questioned this (as clearly she cannot eat anything in the establishment) we were told that we either just pay it or we can order a kids meal for her that we (the parents) could eat.
We declined this as we clearly didn’t come to a restaurant to eat from the kids menu….
What is everyone’s thoughts on this? Is this a common practice? Do you think it’s right?
Forum Charged $30 cover at a restaurant for a 3 month old baby?!
Posted by Harp_and_banks, 2nd August 2020
45 Reply
7:55 am
6:32 pm
5:25 pm
3:03 pm
11:20 am
10:39 am
9:36 am
8:46 am
7:31 am
12:04 am
11:56 pm
11:24 pm
9:16 pm
9:13 pm
9:34 pm
2:09 pm
11:01 pm
4:09 pm
10:22 pm
6:12 pm
To post a review/comment please join us or login so we can allocate your points.