We recently dined at a local restaurant as a family of four. Husband, myself, our 10 year old and our 3 month old.
Upon ordering we were informed that we would be charged $30 cover charge for our 3 month old.
When we questioned this (as clearly she cannot eat anything in the establishment) we were told that we either just pay it or we can order a kids meal for her that we (the parents) could eat.
We declined this as we clearly didn’t come to a restaurant to eat from the kids menu….
What is everyone’s thoughts on this? Is this a common practice? Do you think it’s right?
Forum Charged $30 cover at a restaurant for a 3 month old baby?!
Posted by Harp_and_banks, 2nd August 2020
1:54 pm
11:58 am
8:43 am
8:42 am
11:38 pm
10:52 pm
4:00 pm
6:19 pm
12:04 pm
6:21 am
8:10 pm
7:17 pm
5:57 pm
11:47 pm
12:03 am
11:12 am
10:42 am
11:42 pm
1:25 pm
10:05 am
To post a review/comment please join us or login so we can allocate your points.