Hello!

50 Comment

A mum says she went ‘ballistic’ after finding out her three-year-old wasn’t allowed to eat what he’d packed for kindergarten, because the teacher deemed it ‘too unhealthy’.

Sharing an image of the breakfast she’d packed for her son to take to kindy, the mum revealed she had included a unsalted sunflower seeds, banana chops, apple and a croissant. She explained that when she picked up her son, he was confused and hungry.

“Today my son wasn’t allowed to eat his breakfast in kindergarten, because it was deemed to be too unhealthy,” the mum explained.

“He’s a picky eater too and was really excited about his breakfast. I packed him apple slices, freeze dried banana chips, sunflower seeds and (the ultimate culprit) a croissant.

“Safe to say I went ballistic on the teacher. My poor boy was so confused and hungry when I got him.”

The angry mum, who lives in Germany, relayed her conversation with her son’s teacher, and her shock at the whole situation.

Mum: So how did everything go? Did he have his breakfast?
Teacher: It was alright. He did try some apple.
Mum: Oh that’s weird, he didn’t want the rest?
Teacher: Yeah, he wanted his croissant, but we told him he couldn’t have it.
Mum: And why is that?
Teacher: Because it’s too unhealthy.
Mum: What is unhealthy about a croissant?
Teacher: We like a healthy breakfast here in *** kindergarten.
Mum: And what does that mean for you?
Teacher: Toast with salami or cream cheese for instance is what most kids are having.
Mum: Well first of all he doesn’t like either of those and secondly you’re trying to tell me, that toast and processed meat is healthier than a croissant? That’s ridiculous!
Teacher: Yeah well those are the rules.
Mum: I’ll try and figure something out, thanks. Bye.

Her post was met with thousands of comments, some sympathising with the mum and others siding with the teacher. So the mum offered further explanation.

“To everyone commenting how unhealthy this is and no wonder the poor teacher didn’t want him to eat this food: go touch some grass. You either don’t have children, are incredibly bored, survive on shitty food yourself and are trying to cope or you’re just trying to stir up some shit for no reason.

“Was it the healthiest breakfast ever? No! Definitely not. I never claimed it was. It is a realistic breakfast for a toddler though. Also it contains carbs, fat and protein (sunflower seeds), so it could be way worse. For everyone claiming there wasn’t anything fresh: are you blind? I cut the apple right before kindergarten. The banana is freeze dried and also contains a lot of vitamins, just like the seeds. Literally the only processed food was the bloody croissant. Don’t tell me you’ve never had a shitty croissant before!”

The mum has asked for a private meeting with the kindergarten, saying while she understands they have policies, it’s not ok to let a child go hungry.

What do you think of this situation? Have your say in the comments below. 

 

  • Not right to leave the child hungry, they should’ve provided a substitute option! Mother however probably should’ve spoken to management rather than going ‘ballistic’ at the teacher.

    Reply

  • I would be removing my child from this facility. It’s ridiculous that you are judged for your meal choices. That meal was fine. A little of everything as a breakfast and salami for breakfast might be normal in Germany but the teacher was wrong to not let the child eat the food provided. If she had a problem text Mum and have a conversation. Time too Leave!

    Reply

  • So they would rather leave the child to starve???

    This is so wrong

    Reply

  • I think everything in moderation. I don’t see anything bad in that lunchbox. It shouldn’t be up to the teacher to be telling a parent what you should and shouldn’t be feeding a child.
    Teachers just need to teach. Maybe a class on the food pyramid and healthier lunchbox options for growing bodies might be a topic she may want to cover next.

    Reply

  • I am livid just reading this!! Salami is NOT healthy and the croissant is healthier than processed meat!


    • I agree, it’s a shocking suggestion

    Reply

  • First of all, if they are not going to allow the child to eat something then they need to replace that with something else that the child will eat. Yes, croissants are unhealthy as they are full of butter, etc. However, everything else was healthy. I don’t see a problem with this for breakfast, as long as through the day he is eating healthier options. Perhaps this was a once a week treat for breakfast? Regardless, it’s the parents decision what they feed their kids.

    Reply

  • That’s absolutely terrible and unacceptable.

    Reply

  • I would be curious if it is a written policy that only healthy food are allowed (specified by a list what is considered to be healthy) and that in the case they don’t consider the food healthy is will be denied to the kids. And if so; are the parent made aware and signed for this ? When this is not the case it will make your complaint stronger

    Reply

  • What the hell, she needs to complain. How can they not let the child eat! Totally unacceptable.

    Reply

  • I agree with the mum !


    • I would certainly make a complaint by the Department of Education or the Goverment



      • In fact you could consider to report to Child Protection when your child is denied food

    Reply

  • I mean this seems fake. You’re telling me a kinda starved a poor child? That’s child abuse. If that was me, I’d be reporting them right away and taking this further, not just say “i’ll see what else i can do”. Clout farming for sure.

    Reply

  • What a disgrace. So they preferred this child go hungry? How dare they.

    Reply

  • I think the education line has been crossed here. You decide what your child will likely want to have. Not the teacher. They can encourage healthy eating but at the end of the day they are not the parent.


    • Yes, teachers should keep their noses out of kids lunch boxes unless they see a child has nothing every single day

    Reply

  • That’s just insane!! So them making the child skip a meal is healthy?? Let the kid eat what they like especially if they are fussy

    Reply

  • It’s not the worst thing. Im amazed at how strict they are

    Reply

  • Kids are fussy as it is, should be happy they ate anything regardless. What is this world really coming to, sending love

    Reply

  • I couldn’t believe this when I read the original post. How can a teacher think a child going without anything is better than them eating. It’s not a cake. The OP had said in comments that the school doesn’t allow ‘unhealthy food’ but doesn’t go into specifics or have any banned list. I would be just as upset.

    Reply

  • I agree that’s not too bad as a breakfast. And no matter what, the kid should have been allowed to eat it, and a discussion had with his mother later, if necessary.

    Reply

  • This is absolutely disgusting, i would be furious. How dare they do this and stop a child from eating their food. What has the world come too.

    Reply

  • Ridiculous. Kids can be so fussy and a croissant isn’t the end of the world.

    Reply

Post a comment

To post a review/comment please join us or login so we can allocate your points.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating
Join