Hello!

53 Comment

CADBURY has been slammed over an Easter egg packed with more sugar than a child should eat in 17 days.

The Dairy Milk Crunchie Ultimate Chocolate (570 grams) contains 330g of sugar.

Public Health England says four to six year olds should have up to 19g a day, reports The Sun.

Those aged seven to ten should only eat 24g and adults less than 30g.

Other eggs also slammed for high sugar content include the Maltesers Crunchy Easter Egg plus additional treats (271.5g sugar), Nestle Smarties chocolate egg with Smarties tube (261g) and the Cadbury Dairy Milk with Oreo large Easter Egg with two chocolate bars (195g).

The National Obesity Forum said: “These eggs are a real risk to health.”

easter egg cadbury egg

A leading psychologist is calling for kids to be denied Easter eggs until they are at least four.

Dr Becky Spelman is calling for age restrictions to be put on larger eggs to stop kids gorging on chocolate.

With a health crisis worsening, and Easter eggs being readily available at cheap prices, Dr Becky believes parents could be doing more bad than good for their kids.

She said: “Easter Eggs should be banned to any child under the age of four”, according to The Sun.

“Easter is the worst time of the year for millennial parents as it’s completely focused on getting a large amount of chocolate treats all at once.

“This is a nightmare situation for parents of this generation as they have no idea how to teach their children to delay their response to cravings.

“This leads children to binge and parents to let them binge as they have no idea how else to deal with the situation.

“Once a child starts overeating behaviour at a young age it’s very hard to turn things around for them in terms of food and their eating habits moving forward, leading to obesity from at very young age.”

She goes on to say, “Easter Eggs should be clearly marked with age restrictions. Larger chocolate eggs need to labelled as ‘not suitable for children below four years of age’ as children below four do not know how to regulate their consumption levels and it could lead to the start of a poor relationship with food.

“Leaving a child below 4 years old unattended with an Easter egg is risky in terms of consumption and how this will start to influence their future relationship with food.”

Recently a concerned mum warned parents about the dangers of children and solid Easter eggs. Read more on that HERE.

Doesn’t it come back to “everything in moderation?” What do you think? Does anyone actually sit and eat one of the big eggs in one sitting? Surely not!

Share your comments below.

  • having easter eggs once a year will not make an obesity problem which is what this phrase in the text is suggesting. “Once a child starts overeating behaviour at a young age it’s very hard to turn things around for them in terms of food and their eating habits moving forward, leading to obesity from at very young age.”
    This is completely out of context.

    Reply

  • I bought reasonably big ones this year while they were on special and they were cheaper than the smaller ones. They were only allowed some and the rest of each one was broken up and stored in separate airtight containers in the fridge up out of reach.
    I remember one year when I was a child I was given a reading lamp. The globe had been removed and the medium size Easter Egg was in its place. It was probably small compared with what others received.

    Reply

  • We don’t buy a lot of chocolate eggs. And my daughter never eats them all at once. They can last for months. I think it also depends on the kids. If we think they are going to overindulge, better to take some away.

    Reply

  • I agree with this psychologist that moderation is good and that the huge focus on chocolate isn’t healthy. Beside that there is the danger aspect for younger kids with solid eggs. I only bought a few small Easter eggs from the health food store.

    Reply

  • Seriously, if it’s a safety issue then yes but if they eat well the rest of the year then some chocolate treats at Easter won’t hurt them! Lighten up!

    Reply

  • Moderation is the key which includes the consumption of chocolate.

    Reply

  • I agree with the “everything in moderation” outlook.

    Reply

  • Agreed that over consumption could pose to be an issue for some and may lead to unhealthy relationships with food. Disagree that we need to govern the Risk of over consumption with warning labels on eggs. One would hope that some common sense and a bit of a parent spine could overcome an infant binge at Easter.


    • I agree – such sensible comments about Easter eggs and the consumption of them.

    Reply

  • I Agree with the psychologist that we should teach kids to have everything in moderation I don’t buy lots of Easter eggs only a few and give it to kids only if they do chores

    Reply

  • Since when are easter eggs cheap? We only give our son a small egg but its the rest of the family that go overboard. I ration it out and eat as much as I can without him noticing.

    Reply

  • It’s hard being a parent. Makes sense and probably not hard if you only have one but difficult to explain to a 3 year old why they are missing out while their older siblings are not. Might need some more nonfood treats for Easter to make things easier.

    Reply

Post a comment

To post a review/comment please join us or login so we can allocate your points.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating
Join