The article really is like a ‘nothing’ article. Congrats though. Gorgeous baby.

Don’t think she knows what she is really saying in this post.

• • 
  • • mom19782016 replied
    • 10 Mar 2019 , 5:14 pm

  ---

  Agreed. Not sure I really got anything out of this

mmm, don’t get the heading with relation to the content.

I don’t think she knows what gender neutral really is

Congratulations Kate, enjoy your new bub

I like the pics of Kate and her new baby girl, but I don’t really get what she is trying to say or what the article is about?

• • 
  • • mom93821 replied
    • 28 Jan 2019 , 3:22 pm

  ---

  The pics are indeed delightful!

The article didn’t really make sense to me either

Not sure what this article is about.

This is confusing did she say genderless because she’s excited to buy clothes now but not with the boys. I think her comments may have been ta out of context.

Doesn’t sound like it’s so much gender less as just trying to avoid traditional gender assumptions.

Nice relaxed pics of Kate and her little one.

I’m wondering if that is actually what Kate Hudson said or it is sensationalist journalism.

I too don’t understand the point of the article.

I don’t really get all the hype. She’s dressing her as a girl in pink coloured clothing but raising her genderless?

• • 
  • • Ellen replied
    • 26 Jan 2019 , 6:10 pm

  ---

  

  True, she’s maybe not as genderless in her approach in the end.

not really sure what the point of the article was?? But I read it none the less as I LOVE Kate Hudson – she has a gorgeous family