A Perth woman has avoided being sent to jail but must undergo counselling as part of a suspended prison term after she was charged with taking her children from welfare authorities.

The 34-year-old mother, “forcibly” removed her two boys, aged three and 11, from child protection officers during a supervised visit with the children in February 2015.

Under a court order made four mothers earlier, the boys were in the care of the Department for Child Protection (DCP).

The woman managed to evade authorities for close to 36 hours, before Police located the children at a house in Perth’s south east.

The court heard that the the woman’s actions were “impulsive”, driven from a need to spend some “normal time” with her children.

In handing down his decision, District Court Judge Laurie Levy said the offences were heightened in nature, as the woman was in the company of a number of men at the time of the incident, and the DCP officers were violently pushed and shoved before removing the children.

The Judge further explained that whilst immediate terms of imprisonment to be imposed for such offences was “common”, in this case a suspended jail term was the best course of action.

He did however, order the woman to undergo counselling as she did not seem to accept the need for DCP to be in her children’s lives.

“Until she acknowledges the need for DCP’s intervention and accepts it, she’s not going to move forward,” Judge Levy said. “The interests of your children are a significant factor in this case and prison would be a backward step for their lives,” he told the woman.

Image source: DepositPhotos

We may get commissions for purchases made using links in this post. Learn more.
  • This seems a pretty fair assessment.


  • Poor kids – I hope they are doing ok. The Department doesn’t always act in the best way either.


  • I do not know the circumstances must be reason for visits under supervision (maybe this should be checked further. It is noemal for a mum to want closeness with children. As said issue needs further investigtion as to whether she is capable of being alone with her children


  • I can understand taking your children as I’d donthe same if I were only allowed supervised visits. But as a foster carer, I know I wouldn’t allow my children to be in such a position to begin with by insuring they were safe and well cared for.


  • I can understand how frustrating it would be to not see your kids under your own conditions, even if it was for their best interest. Hope she can sort herself out and have them back safely.


  • I don’t know the circumstances that led to the children being removed from the Mother’s care. Sometimes the Mums are allowed supervised visits. They have to be arranged in advance and plenty of supervision in place.


  • Lke gd


  • Lke hz


Post a comment
Add a photo
Your MoM account

Lost your password?

Enter your email and a password below to post your comment and join MoM:

You May Like


Looks like this may be blocked by your browser or content filtering.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating