The twin brother of Stephanie Scott’s murderer is set to be freed from prison in just eight days.

The NSW director of public prosecutions decided not to appeal his sentence, reports Daily Mail.

Marcus Stanford, 25, was sentenced to 15 months in jail on Wednesday for his role as an accessory to the murder, after he pawned Ms Scott’s engagement and graduation rings for $705.

Stanford’s sentence was backdated to when he was arrested on June 10 last year, meaning he will be released on September 9.

NSW Director of Public Prosecutions Lloyd Babb SC announced on Thursday afternoon he had decided not to appeal the punishment.

‘I have formed the view that there are no reasonable prospects of success against the inadequacy of the sentence,’ Mr Babb said in a statement.

The sentencing judge, Justice Robert Allan Hulme, said last week Stanford’s decision to sell the murdered woman’s rings was ‘utterly appalling, disgraceful and inexcusable’.

However, Justice Hulme said the seriousness of Marcus Stanford’s crime was in the low range for such offences, an assessment with which the prosecution agreed.

Marcus Stanford’s twin brother, Vincent Stanford, attacked the 26-year-old teacher at Leeton High School, in the state’s Riverina, on Easter Sunday 2015, days before she was due to marry her childhood sweetheart.

Vincent Stanford dragged her to a store room, sexually assaulted her and stabbed her in the neck.

The murderer removed Ms Scott’s engagement ring given to her by fiance Aaron Leeson-Woolley, and a graduation ring from her mother, and sent them with her driver’s licence in an envelope to his brother’s Adelaide address.

Marcus Stanford sold the rings for $705 at an Adelaide jewellery store and burned the driver’s licence.

Vincent Stanford has admitted raping and murdering Ms Scott and will be sentenced in October.

Share your comments below.

Image stock photo

We may get commissions for purchases made using links in this post. Learn more.
  • The brother is an accessory to the murder? Was he aware of what his brother had done? He should have got suspicious about the rings if he only got a note with them to sell them and the fat that there was other papers.


  • You’d expect a longer sentence for being involved in such a horrific crime, especially one with so much media coverage


  • A longer sentence is required for his part in this shocking crime.


  • He was an accessory to a murder. Surely he deserved a longer sentence.


  • Not long enough in my opinion.


  • 15 months is indeed quite a low sentence.


  • This is WRONG – Not long enough … ok, he did not kill her, but he knew all about it. How about we al help a murderer, and a sexual predator? RIP beautiful Stephanie


Post a comment
Like Facebook page

LIKE MoM on Facebook

Add a photo
Your MoM account

Lost your password?

Enter your email and a password below to post your comment and join MoM:

You May Like


Looks like this may be blocked by your browser or content filtering.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating