Hello!

November 2, 2018

19 Comments

Tick-tock – for healthy mums and kids, dad’s age counts. It’s not just women who need to consider their age when planning a family.

Sarah Robertson, University of Adelaide

Women are regularly reminded of their ticking biological clock. It turns out men should also pay attention to age when it comes to having a family.

A new study published today in the British Medical Journal provides persuasive evidence that children – and pregnant mums – are more likely to have health problems when dads are older.

Men’s fertility declines with age, but not as sharply as women’s. Men can continue to father children into later life – as Mick Jagger and other celebrity fathers demonstrate.

But it takes longer to get pregnant. One study in European men showed a 50% lower chance of conceiving after a year of trying at age 35, compared with men younger than 25.

Plus, women with partners age 35 and older may be more likely to experience miscarriage than those with younger partners.




Read more:
Most men don’t realise age is a factor in their fertility too


Higher odds of premature birth

The latest study shows that the chances of pregnancy and birth problems are also increased when dads are older.

Researchers at Stanford University in California analysed data on all 40 million live births in the United States between 2007 and 2016 to look at how paternal age affects outcomes for the infant and the mother.

As the father’s age increased, so did the chances of the infant being born prematurely, having a low birth weight, or requiring medical intervention after delivery, such as assisted ventilation, admission to neonatal intensive care, or antibiotics.



It takes dads over 35 longer to conceive than those under 25.
Katie Emslie

When fathers were aged 45 years or more, their children had 14% higher odds of being born premature (less than 37 weeks) and their babies had a 14% greater risk of low birth weight (less than 2.5kg) than when fathers were aged 25 to 34 years.

Infants with fathers aged 45 years or more were also 14% more likely to be admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit, and 18% more likely to have seizures.

If the father was 55 years or older, newborns also tended to score less well on the Apgar test used to assess the health of a child at birth.

These effects were present after adjusting for the mother’s age, smoking, race, education, and number of prenatal visits.

Future risk of disease

These latest findings add to earlier studies showing older age in fathers is linked with a variety of health conditions affecting the offspring.

Scientists in Denmark have calculated the chances of congenital problems linked to older fatherhood and show that several conditions become more prevalent. These include rare developmental conditions such as achondroplasia (dwarfism) and cleft palate.

Cancer rates among offspring also seem to rise as dads become older.




Read more:
Why men need to think about their fertility too


Arguably the most concerning impact is on neurodevelopment and mental health. Offspring of older fathers have an increased risk of schizophrenia, mental retardation, and autism spectrum disorders.

The risk of schizophrenia increases by 47% when fathers are over 45 years old.

The rate of childhood autism increases by 80% when dads conceive after age 45.


Sign up for the newsletter



 

Sign up to Thrive, a weekly dose of evidence to help you live well.


So what’s going on?

Changes in the sperm of older men are likely to contribute. The number of defective sperm containing DNA mutations increase steadily every year as men age. These arise as exposure to radiation, environmental toxins, alcohol and smoking take their toll.

Ageing itself results in less testosterone and a decline in the number and function of testicular cells.



Most older dads won’t have fertility problems.
Picsea

However, genetics isn’t the full explanation. In particular, increased risk of psychiatric illness doesn’t seem to be due to spontaneous mutations in sperm DNA. While mutations contribute, they account for only about 10% to 20% of the effect.

Another possibility is that genetic risk factors naturally more prevalent in men destined to be older fathers might be passed on to their offspring, rather than new mutations.

Mothers also at risk

The latest data showed negative effects of delayed fatherhood not just for the infants, but also the pregnant mothers.

The risk of gestational diabetes for pregnant women increased in line with the age of the father, with women carrying the child of a man aged 55 years or older having a 34% higher odds of gestational diabetes.

The researchers estimate that around 13% of premature births and 18% of gestational diabetes in pregnancies associated with older fathers were attributable to the advanced age of the father.




Read more:
What’s the point of sex? It’s communication at a biological level


This is hard to reconcile with a genetic explanation. Other biological effects of seminal fluid on pregnancy health may be to blame.

The female immune system responds to seminal fluid by generating immune tolerance, which protects against inflammatory exposures that can harm the fetus. Human seminal fluid contains signals known to stimulate the female immune response, but it’s not yet proven whether these factors decline as men age.

What does this all mean for men contemplating fatherhood?

Most older dads don’t have fertility problems and can father babies without serious physical or developmental problems.

Overall, the father’s age is substantially less important than the mother’s age, and generally the pregnancy disorders and infant health problems are rare. So the current research evidence doesn’t justify dissuading older men from becoming fathers.



The children of most older dads will be fine.
Brittany Simuangco

But the medical community must do a better job of communicating to couples an understanding of the risks of advanced paternal age.

Most importantly, we must include men in conversations about pregnancy planning and preconception care, to ensure all couples have the best chance of raising a healthy child.The Conversation

Sarah Robertson, Professor and Director, Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Share your comments below

We may get commissions for purchases made using links in this post. Learn more.
  • I would think that no matter what its not as big a risk as a womans age. I know plenty of older males who have fathered children withotu issue and without the child having health conerns.

    Reply

  • Now there is something to think about, thank you.

    Reply

  • Good to know it’s not always the woman’s fault. For years I blamed myself for not being able to have more children.

    Reply

  • It makes sense that the older a man is the older his sperm is and the more likely for difficulties.

    Reply

  • Interesting that research is finally being done into males and their reproductivity.

    Reply

  • Wow when you think of the 1800’s and even 1900’s it was always the womans fault for not getting pregnant, miscarriage and or health issues of the baby along with premmies, we have come a long was as a society.

    Reply

  • Wonderful that dads are thinking it just may be them not their wife. Many early diseases like mumps can impair a males ability to father a child. But most males in times past wouldn’t believe it was them who was the reason why their wife didn’t become pregnant.

    Reply

  • You don’t hear much about infertility in men at all

    Reply

  • Good luck to all (old or young) trying to have a baby. Nothing mind blowing about it being more difficult as dad (or mum) age.

    Reply

  • I’ve heard about this before. It makes sense that age has a contributing factor.

    Reply

  • It seems already fairly well known that age in genders can be a determining factor in conception.

    Reply

  • Interesting, but not really new !


    • I thought it was fairly well known too.

    Reply

  • Definitely need more research and education in this area.

    Reply

  • If this research is correct men should be warned of the risks in them fathering children at a later age too. The blame for premature birth and other problems may not be as much the fault of the Mums as thought to be

    Reply

  • Interstesting research i really didn’t know that if men are over 35 their fertility starts to decline

    Reply

  • I always thought men were mostly ok their whole lives and that it was women who had to get a move on. a very interesting read.

    Reply

  • Definitely something that most men don’t think about.

    Reply

  • Gosh if fertility drops 50% at age 35, how unlucky are stars like mick jagger and Rod Stewart and Ron wood to impregnate women in their 60s and 70s?!

    Reply

Post a comment

To post a review/comment please join us or login so we can allocate your points.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating
Join