A study has found that one of two ‘cervical stitch’ treatments used thousands of times a year to prevent premature birth is worse than the other.

Research found babies are three times as likely to be stillborn or miscarried and almost twice as likely to be born prematurely.

Daily Mail reports, researchers, from Imperial College London, say it is important that women are aware of the risk – and are urging surgeons to change their practice.

If they all used the safer technique, 260 babies lives could be saved a year in the UK.

There would also be almost 300 fewer premature births.

Worldwide, more than 170,000 deaths could be prevented, the journal Science Translational Medicine reports.

Cervical stitching, which is performed an estimated 3,250 times a year in the UK, involves sewing up the neck of the womb to keep the unborn baby inside for longer.

Surgeons can use a thin, fishing line-type thread, or a thicker, tape-like one that looks something like a shoelace.

In Britain, the thicker version is used 80 per cent of the time, because it is easier to work with and is thought to provide more support.

Researchers discovered those given the thicker thread were much more likely to lose their baby or give birth prematurely than those with the thinner thread.

Further research suggested the mesh-like structure of the thick thread acts as a breeding ground for bacteria that can trigger dangerous infections in the womb.

Researcher Dr David MacIntyre said: ‘We found potentially dangerous bacteria grew more easily on the thicker thread.

‘This may be because bacteria can latch on to the woven structure of the thick thread more easily than the smooth, thin thread.’

Professor Phillip Bennett said: ‘We strongly advise that the thicker thread – which is currently used in the majority of procedures – only be used in a research setting whilst we thoroughly investigate the risks this may hold.’

Share your comments below.

Image via shutterstock

We may get commissions for purchases made using links in this post. Learn more.
  • This isn’t new though is it? I’m sure my sister in law had cervical stitches to prevent miscarriage in the early 80s. It worked for her


  • We need them to use the safest method. There is no advantage if the baby is going to be a miscarriage, too premature to survive or stillborn. I thought the idea of stitching to prevent miscarriage.


  • If there are so many risks, better to avoid it indeed, till further studies.


  • there are always new developments in medicine


Post a comment
Like Facebook page

LIKE MoM on Facebook

Add a photo
Your MoM account

Lost your password?

Enter your email and a password below to post your comment and join MoM:

You May Like


Looks like this may be blocked by your browser or content filtering.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating