Hello!

21 Comments

Enedina Vance shared a picture of her six-month-old daughter on Facebook sporting a dimple piercing, it was her way of sending a strong message to other parents.

Showing her daughter with a cheek ‘piercing’, Ms Vance had actually photoshopped the jewel into her daughter’s face to prove a point. Yes, it is FAKE!

Her post has gone viral causing plenty of controversy and shock. Nearly 12,000 shares and over 140 comments.

Her original post:
“So I got the baby girl’s dimple pierced!!

It looks so cute, right?!! I just know she’s gonna love it!! She’ll thank me when she’s older lol If she decides she doesn’t like it, she can just take it out, no big deal.

I’m the parent, she is MY CHILD, I will do whatever I want!! I make all of her decisions until she’s 18, I made her, I own her!! I don’t need anyone’s permission, I think it’s better, cuter, & I prefer her to have her dimple pierced. Its NOT abuse!! If it was, it would be illegal, but it’s not. People pierce their babies everyday, this is no different

MY BABY, MY CHOICE!! PARENT’S CHOICE, PARENT’S RIGHTS!! Don’t judge my parenting, we all raise our kids differently, it’s none of your business anyway!!

#BodilyIntegrity, #MyBodyMyChoice, #HumanRights, #ChildrensRights, #Intactivism, #IntactGeneration #sarcasm

“I can’t believe how many people actually believe my photo is real,” Vance tells Yahoo Beauty. “So many people are outraged at the thought of piercing my baby at such a young age, without her consent, and against her will. Yet, they don’t understand how other body mutilations, alterations, and modifications are the exact same thing for the exact same reason: aesthetic purposes.”

The mother-of-six became an activist against body alterations in children when she was pregnant for the first time. Her doctor asked whether she wanted to circumcise her baby or not.

“I found out that research from around the world proves genital cutting serves absolutely no health benefits at all,” she says. “In fact, studies I found show genital cutting actually causes damage to the penis. Lifelong damage. It’s only here in the US that there are claimed ‘medical reasons’ or ‘health benefits’ for genital cutting, but they have all been proven false.”

She wanted to educate others on the subject and has done just that in follow-up posts on her Facebook page.

“I’m very passionate about children’s right to physical integrity. Each and every one of us has the right to our own body, our entire body,” she says, “Why not children? The U.S. set a law in place protecting infant girls from cultural and religious genital cutting in 1997. Why are infant boys not equally protected?”

“If ‘piercing’ my baby’s face is so enraging because she’s a baby without consent, why aren’t people just as enraged over piercing any other part of her body? Why are her ears any different than her face?” Vance says. “Why is it OK to modify, alter, and mutilate our children to society’s standards? And why do people get so angry when I point out their hypocrisy?”

“It should be each person’s choice what to do with their bodies. Not even your parents should be able to decide.”

The video below offers some great explanation and points for consideration.  *Language warning*

Do you think the way this mum went about making her point is perfect or a bit too far?

Share your comments below.

Image via Facebook

We may get commissions for purchases made using links in this post. Learn more.
  • yeah winding up the internet and making a trollific point :)

    Reply

  • Oh well each to their own, cheers.

    Reply

  • Yes, I think it was a a bit unclear initially what she was trying to achieve.

    Reply

  • You can’t make a point publicly and not expect a reaction, in saying that though other people’s reactions can be ridiculous

    Reply

  • She faked this story in order to make a point – she also should have known she would get a reaction. Not sure whether she made her point, or just enraged people.

    Reply

  • Now that got everyones attention.

    Reply

  • Plenty of backlash to this story on social media – a lot of people did not read or understand the full story and assumed the piercing was real! The story and message were possibly written in a style that did not get the message across to some people.


    • Indeed. Always read a story. Just afterwards express your opinion. :-)



      • Exactly – it was a not a story to skim read. I read and re-read it to understand the content and message.

    Reply

  • She certainly made a very good point. Good on her

    Reply

  • She sure provoked some responses ! No, she didn’t go too far in my opinion, people can be very hypocrite indeed. She didn’t harm her baby.

    Reply

  • She’s clearly passionate about this issue and it certainly is a thought provoking argument she makes.

    Reply

  • It’s definitely one way to get her point across.

    Reply

  • She certainly got people talking. If that was what she wanted – she succeeded

    Reply

  • it looks like it’s been photo shopped, it doesn’t even look like it’s a stick on one.

    Reply

  • When I first saw the photo I assumed it was one of those stick on diamonte things, not a photoshopped cheek piercing!
    I think she did a great thing, no harm was done to her baby, and it’s of people now thinking about the souble standards of what is and is not acceptable to do to your children!

    Reply

  • Interesting way to make a point. I’m sure she wasn’t expecting the backlash.

    Reply

Post a comment
Add a photo
Your MoM account


Lost your password?

Enter your email and a password below to post your comment and join MoM:

You May Like

Loading…

Looks like this may be blocked by your browser or content filtering.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating
Join