The family home is by far the most valuable asset for most families.

Therefore, it only makes sense to take every precaution to protect it. Remember, when a person files for bankruptcy, their assets are “vested in” their trustee in bankruptcy, who can sell the assets to pay creditors. No one ever plans to face bankruptcy, but there is always steps you can take to safeguard yourself against any possible future outcome.

Your home is not safe from creditors

The family home is NOT protected under the Bankruptcy Act. If there is equity in your home, the trustee in bankruptcy will enforce the sale of your home and net the proceeds on behalf of creditors.

Therefore, whether your family home is registered solely in your name or jointly with your spouse, it is important to review your situation if your home is at risk from creditors. This may be so if you are a business owner, or if you fear you may be subject to a claim as a director of a company.

Powers of the Trustee in bankruptcy

The trustee in bankruptcy has the power to enforce the sale of your family home, even if it is held in the joint names of the bankrupt and their spouse. This is true even if the non-bankrupt spouse is debt-free, has no knowledge of the debt and is at no fault. This applies both where the real property is held as joint tenants and tenants in common.

Once the family home is vested in the trustee, the joint ownership of the asset is “severed”. This means the bankrupt’s share in the asset is separated and can be used to pay creditors. The non-bankrupt’s share is NOT prejudiced. It is unfortunate for them, however, that the only way for creditors to obtain the value of the bankrupt’s share of the home is for it to be sold in its entirety. This is, unless of course, the non-bankrupt person is willing to pay the bankrupt’s share of the asset to the trustee.

What rights does a non-bankrupt spouse have?

While the position of the non-bankrupt spouse seems quite glum, they do have some very important rights. An example is where the bankrupt spouse has taken out a loan secured by a mortgage against the family home, which is for their own benefit – for example, a subsequent mortgage to buy a car. Here, that loan may “come off” the bankrupt spouse’s share in the property, rather than the non-bankrupt’s share, essentially leaving the non-bankrupt’s share unaffected.

What can I do to protect my home?

Bankruptcy is a complex area of law, especially when it comes to how assets, such as the family home, are dealt with. If you and your family ever find yourself in this situation, please don’t panic or allow a trustee in bankruptcy to dictate what happens to your assets. You will often have better options available.

The most effective way to give yourself other options is to engage in prior planning and crisis prevention. If bankruptcy is a possible threat in your future, you may want to consider one of the following steps:

a) Have the asset put only in the name of the spouse that is not at risk of bankruptcy, or another entity;

b) If it is not possible for the non-at-risk spouse to secure a mortgage on their own, you could, instead, put a small percentage of the asset in the at-risk spouse’s name, and the major share of the asset in the name of the not-at-risk spouse.

The cost of these steps is insignificant in light of the potential benefits. Any such transfer between spouses is exempt from stamp duty, so only conveyancing fees will apply, which are minimal when compared to the potential benefit.

Timing is critical

If you take these steps within 6 months of the commencement of bankruptcy, the trustee in bankruptcy could seek to have the transfer reversed. However, if you take these steps early, and become bankrupt at some future date, the transfer will be valid, and your family home will be protected.

Do you have any other advice to share? Comment below.

  • Bit hard to get my head around but thanks all the same (maybe I need a coffee!)


  • Not relevant to me but good to know. I can share with others.


  • I found this a bit hard to understand. At this stage I don’t think we have to worry but you just never know.


  • Complex info, but good to know.


  • The law is so hard to interpret.


  • I used to worry about not owning my home. Reading this has made me realise how things can quickly go wrong. I’m happy renting


  • Thanks for the article, I agree that you have to be very careful about transferring assets especially if bankruptcy is in your near future as this can be seen as hiding assets and you can be punished for it up to and including jail time. If you are heading in this direction then do your research and understand the consequences.


  • This would be important to a lot of people.


  • Thank you for this informative article.


  • We don’t own our own house and sometimes I just think it makes life a bit more simple :)


  • I know of a couple who had their own business. Their Accountant advised then to transfer the house solely into her name which they did. A few months later they had an issue with their food processing machinery which caused product recalls and other problems. They had to file for bankrupcy to debts caused by it and the issue about their family home being transferred solely into her name. There was a lor of media publicity. The business was in a sound positive financial situation when the did it.


  • Thanks for your article,information we do need to know!


Post a comment
Like Facebook page

LIKE MoM on Facebook

Please enter your comment below
Would you like to include a photo?
No picture uploaded yet.
Please wait to see your image preview here before hitting the submit button.
Your MoM account

Lost your password?

Enter your email and a password below to post your comment and join MoM:

You May Like


Looks like this may be blocked by you browser or content filtering.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating