New research indicates even “BPA-free” plastic may not be a safe choice.
The Courier Mail reports that new research from the US has shown a popular chemical alternative to BPA can also pose significant health risks, including disrupting hormones and embryo formation.
The woman behind the study, Professor Nancy Wayne, from UCLA, said the findings were both frightening and important.
“As much as feasible, limit plastic food and beverage containers,” she said.
“It’s time to go back to stainless steel Thermos containers and paper lunch bags.”
BPA, a chemical used in polycarbonate plastics as well as epoxy resins, which coat the inside of food cans, has been linked with prostate cancer, infertility, asthma, heart disease and a number of neurodevelopmental disorders.
Prof Wayne, a reproductive endocrinologist, said her team’s research suggests BPS can also cause changes in embryonic cells.
The researchers exposed zebrafish to low levels of both BPA and BPS monitored the impact. Zebrafish have transparent embryos which allow scientists to see and monitor cell growth.
“Our research showed that low levels of BPS had a similar impact on the embryo as BPA. Consider it the aquatic version of the canary in the coal mine,” Prof Wayne said.
Dr Nick Osborne, an epidemiologist and toxicologist from the University of Sydney who has researched BPA in humans, said: “Everyone has these man-made chemicals in their blood, the question is, is there enough to do harm? If the manufacturers are taking BPA out, what are they putting in as a substitute? We just don’t know.”
Share your comments below.
Image – stock photo
We may get commissions for purchases made using links in this post. Learn more.
-
-
-
-
-
Naomi said
- 10 Apr 2016
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
mom103920 said
- 02 Apr 2016
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
Mummytoabeautifulprincess said
- 29 Feb 2016
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
mom94125 said
- 28 Feb 2016
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
coastalkaryn said
- 22 Feb 2016
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
rachelvk said
- 15 Feb 2016
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
mom90758 said
- 15 Feb 2016
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
mom74640 said
- 15 Feb 2016
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
mom160421 said
- 15 Feb 2016
Reply
Post a comment10:58 pm
11:48 pm
3:26 pm
6:16 pm
7:10 pm
10:01 pm
3:18 pm
12:22 pm
12:05 pm