A photo from an international surf competition has sparked a heated debate about gender equality and the controversial pay gap in sport.

The image shows the two winners of the Billabong Pro Junior series in Ballito, South Africa, proudly accepting their prize money.

While male winner Rio Waida holds a cheque for 8000 rand ($800 AUD) female champ Zoe Steyn’s cheque is only for 4000 rand ($400 AUD).

The photo uploaded to the Ballito Pro Facebook page on Monday, has attracted the anger of thousands of social media users, shared Daily Mail.

Whilst admitting that the image ‘on first glance does look like a huge disparity’, however, World Surf League Australia/Oceania Regional Manager Will Hayden-Smith, claims it doesn’t tell the full story behind the different pay grades.

Mr Hayden-Smith told the ABC the issue was ‘complicated’, and suggested that it was the number of competitors in each event rather than the gender of the athletes themselves that ultimately determined the sum of the prize money.

‘Men get double the prize money only because there are double the competitors,’ he said.

‘In Australia, the prize money at a junior event is $2500 for women and $5000 for men. In the men’s field we have 64 surfers and in the women’s field we have 24.’

In response a statement from the event organisers reads:

“The event organisers of The Ballito Pro, presented by Billabong, and representatives of Billabong, have noted the concerns raised regarding the apparent discrepancy in prize money between the girls’ and boys’ division for the Billabong Junior Series.

“The Ballito Pro maintains its stance as a pro-gender equality competition, which is evident from the ongoing development of the women’s series year-on-year,” said festival organisers. “Based on this commitment to equality, we are meeting with all relevant stakeholders to discuss how any potential discrepancies can be resolved going forward.

“We are grateful to everyone who brought awareness to this issue and we value all the contribution, comment and participation that has prompted discussions, at the highest level, for a speedy resolution.

“The World Surf League (WSL) is the sanctioning body for WSL-aligned surfing events such as The Ballito Pro. The WSL implements certain criteria to determine surf ratings and prize money, and we have formally requested a detailed outline of this process for future discussion.”

Chad D Arcy, event license holder of the Billabong Junior Series, stated: “Billabong has always been actively invested in and supportive of women’s surfing in South Africa. We’ve proudly watched women’s surfing grow over the years, in part thanks to the host of women’s events we’ve run. For many years, we’ve sponsored a team of female athletes, nurturing their careers in surfing from an early age.

“In order for any professional surf event to be internationally accredited, it has to be sanctioned by the WSL. The WSL also determines the allocation of prize money and points for each event.

“As a brand, Billabong is, in every way, committed to gender equality and will continue to support the growth and progression of women’s surfing in South Africa.”

Share your comments below

Image via Facebook

  • Perhaps the winners cheques are different because of the amount of money the sponsors have received from the men and women who enter the sport. There is usually a fee to enter and that pays out the winnings.


  • I never noticed the cheques at first but now that I have, I think it is wrong that the men get more than women. It shouldn’t matter how many male competitors there are, the prize money should be the same for both winners. Hope they have now got the message. Wonder if there were only half the male competitors if they would accept half the prize money the female receive.


  • Funnily enough, when I first looked at this photo I just saw two winners – a male and female. I did not even look at the cheque. I was then bombarbed via eNewsletters and social media I follow with the prize money issue. Absolutely not fair, and no doubt will be damaging to the organisers so I hope by highlighting this – and it has been highlighted everywhere over the past few days — we will see change.


  • I don’t care how many competitors there are, women still work just as hard to get there as men and should be recognised for it.


  • Yep, this seems so wrong. Times are a-changing and soon this will be a thing of the past that we will all look back on in disbelief.


  • I think times are changing and soon we will have equal prize money for these events. Unfortunately it takes time.


  • Huge difference should be equal regardless of gender, age and race.


  • Just another example of gender inequality, no wonder women value themselves less than men and are always trying to better themselves whether it is just looks, parenting or jobs, where as men seem to accept themselves as they are and so does the world!


  • This is a Strange story to me .


  • This seems a strange Basis on which to allocate prize money. Mightn’t a higher prize attract more entrants?


  • I agree that the prize’s amount shouldn’t depend on the number of competitors. I think they should change this rule.


  • Unfortunately the pay inequality thing is real and people experience it at any job


  • That is strange they should get the same.


  • That’s awful!!! Pay inequality.


  • It’s worrying that this is happening at a junior level.


Post a comment
Like Facebook page

LIKE MoM on Facebook

Please enter your comment below
Would you like to include a photo?
No picture uploaded yet.
Please wait to see your image preview here before hitting the submit button.
Your MoM account

Lost your password?

Enter your email and a password below to post your comment and join MoM:

You May Like


Looks like this may be blocked by you browser or content filtering.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating