August 15, 2017


Why kids knock over drinks and must be careful around cars

File 20170808 20166 2rhb0j

Illusions are fun to look at, but they also provide vision scientists with important insights into the way children experience the world. My children found their world changing colour during a recent visit to my lab. 

It is a rare achievement to make it through dinner at our house without someone crying over spilt milk (or water, or any other liquid the kids are drinking). As I mop up the evening mess, I suspect similar scenes are played out at dinner tables around the country.

It doesn’t seem to matter how many times you ask children to pay attention or to be careful. Time and time again, an arm shoots out, milk goes flying and a child protests, “it wasn’t my fault!”

Next time you feel your parental frustration rising, it might be worth considering what science has to say about this. It turns out children may be less responsible for these accidents than you might assume.

Firstly, children do not develop adult levels of visual acuity until around 3-5 years of age. In other words, if young children were able to read they would require much larger text than adults to distinguish the letters.

In addition to fine visual details appearing more blurry, there is considerable evidence that the processing capacity of children is also greatly diminished compared to adults. The concept of “capacity” refers to the number of visual objects or features that a person is typically aware of at any time.

People are often surprised to learn that the vast majority of information in our visual environment normally goes unnoticed. This is particularly the case in cluttered or dynamic environments where a range of influences such as “crowding effects” impact the amount of information we can process at a time.

Items in your peripheral vision are often hard or impossible to detect if they are surrounded by other objects.
Visual Crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition, by David Whitney and Dennis Levi TICS (2011) 15(4):160-168

The figure above is taken from a fantastic review on the topic that describes crowding as a processing “bottleneck” that limits the number of items that can be consciously perceived by an individual at any time.

As shown in the figure if you fixate your eye position to look at the bull’s eye near the construction zone in (a) it is difficult or impossible to recognize the child on the left-hand side of the road, simply because of the presence of the nearby signs. Conversely, it is relatively easy to recognize the child on the right-hand side.

Similarly in (b) if you keep your eyes fixated on the crosses, identification of the middle shape, letter, or line orientation – or even the number of tilted lines – is difficult or impossible on the bottom half of the panel.

Compared to adults, children are both slower to process the identity of new objects and also experience increased “crowding” in their peripheral vision.
Studies looking specifically at the development of visual function in children from 3-15 show greatly increased crowding in children up to the age of 6 or 7. In young children (even up to the ages of 7-10 years) the objects in their visual environment simply never make it into visual awareness.

At the dinner table this reduction in visual capacity can lead to spilt milk and tears. Unfortunately, when kids are playing near the road the consequences can be much more catastrophic.

In both children and adults it is worth noting that the more attention is focused on one thing (such as a conversation, or a ball bouncing away from you) the more likely that other objects or events in your environment will go unnoticed.

In the same way that talking on the phone or text messaging can greatly impair our ability to detect unexpected events, a child chasing after a ball may simply have insufficient processing capacity to detect and notice a car driving down the road.

The ConversationWhile my children have managed to avoid collisions with cars, such single minded determination to catch a ball did recently cause my 5-year-old Max to run blindly into his classmate. The full-speed collision left Max without a tooth, his friend with a bloody forehead and a PE teacher very impressed by the boys’ commitment to the ball!

Olivia Carter, Associate professor, University of Melbourne

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

  • Well ok if science says so…


  • wow that is a new take on this lol i just thought that they were a little clumsy lol. I keep my kids away from the road anyway as it is just common sense and they know not to walk around car parks etc without holding an adults hand


  • An interesting article, thanks for posting.


  • Obviously parents think children as young as 3 y.o. do not see as well as we think they do.


  • Very interesting :)


  • Oh, nice to know this. The consequences can be catastrophic!


  • What an interesting and informative read. Thanks for the post.


  • Very interesting thankyou


  • Great read, thanks !


  • Great article. Holding the hands of our kids while crossing the road is not only safer tho, its a great bonding experience too.


  • An interesting article to read,thanks!


  • good to have it explained


  • Learning is definitely a process!


  • Thanks for the post – this should be broadcast very loudly to all those trying to text or read their phones while walking.


  • I found this very informative …thanks.


Post a comment
Like Facebook page

LIKE MoM on Facebook

Please enter your comment below
Would you like to include a photo?
No picture uploaded yet.
Please wait to see your image preview here before hitting the submit button.
Your MoM account

Lost your password?

Enter your email and a password below to post your comment and join MoM:

You May Like


Looks like this may be blocked by you browser or content filtering.

↥ Back to top

Thanks For Your Star Rating!

Would you like to add a written rating or just a star rating?

Write A Rating Just A Star Rating